17 Aug 2022
On 28 July, we called on our members to help shape our response to the UK Government’s recent proposals on mandatory mediation in England and Wales. We strongly encourage you to respond to the consultation individually as well.
The Government noted that they welcome “responses from court users, the mediation profession, the legal profession, the judiciary, the advice sector, and all those with an interest in the resolution of civil disputes.” A paper summarising the responses to this consultation will be published online by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) in due course.
Writing a response to a consultation is an effective way to ensure your thoughts and opinions are heard at the highest echelons of the government. The MoJ will read through every submission, summarise the general consensus to publish online and discuss the key takeaways with individuals with the power to change the sector for the better.
Specifically, we would like to draw your attention to Question 12, on page 24 of the consultation:
“12. Which existing organisation(s) could be formally recognised as the accreditation body for the civil mediation profession and why?”
We want to ensure the Government fully understands the vital role CIArb plays as a professional body for mediators. As a global professional body, mediation is a core and established component of our purpose. Of our 17,900 members across the world, approximately 4,810 are Mediators, making up more than 25% of our total membership. In England and Wales, approximately 1,100 CIArb members are qualified Mediators. As such we have a strong claim to represent commercial mediators in England and Wales.
We would like you, our members, to highlight this to the Ministry of Justice and emphasize the value of your CIArb professional accreditation. We encourage you to include your own experience, thoughts and feedback in your response, to ensure the Government has many different perspectives to help inform their next steps.
CIArb suggests a few other general points to include in your letter, should you want to extend your response:
Should you have any questions about how to edit your template, what additional key information to include or on how to send it to the Government for submission, please don’t hesitate to reach out and we will assist. Alternatively, if you simply want to input into the CIArb HQ response, please do so by contacting Alexandra Braby (Policy and External Affairs Manager) at email@example.com by Monday 12 September 2022 at the latest.
Please note – delete/change bold as appropriate.
Dispute Resolution Team
Ministry of Justice
102 Petty France
Dear Dispute Resolution Team,
I am writing to you to submit my response on your recent consultation on increasing the use of mediation in the civil justice system. This is something that’s particularly important to me as [insert reason here/I work as a mediator, and this will directly affect my role because…/etc].
Most notably, regarding question 12, I believe that the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb) is ideally placed to be formally recognised as an accreditation body. This is because they are a global professional institution bound by the terms of their royal charter to promote all forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in the public interest. Around 25% of CIArb members globally are practising mediators, and in England and Wales, this figure is approximately 1100. These individuals have had to complete CIArb’s highly regarded training courses, and are bound by the CIArb Code of Ethical and Professional Conduct. As such, any formalised system for the accreditation of mediators in England and Wales should include CIArb.
In addition to the specific question above, I would like to highlight a few other principles that I believe should inform any new framework of mandatory mediation.
I want to take this opportunity to thank you for the open consultation and I look forward to reading the summary of responses and continued action in this sphere.
Should you wish to ask any further questions, please don’t hesitate to reach out.
Insert Name Here
29 Nov 2023Joint intervention success as Churchill judgment allows the courts to order parties to mediate
In a significant moment for mediation, the highly anticipated Churchill judgment overturns the decision in Halsey, confirming it is not a breach of human rights to integrate mediation into the court process and, where appropriate, to order parties to mediate. CMC, Ciarb and CEDR joined forces to intervene in the case, arguing strongly for this outcome.
16 Nov 2023Ciarb intervenes twice during UNCITRAL WG III’s latest session
In a lively session focusing on the establishment of an advisory centre in international law and cross-cutting issues, Ciarb intervened twice on behalf of members.
14 Nov 2023Payments for construction contracts and statutory adjudication around the globe
Janey L. Milligan LLM FCIArb FRICS compares construction payment and adjudication legislation in the UK, Singapore and Ontario, Canada.