CIArb News

Summary University CUM Court Annexed Arbitration Scheme

05 Dec 2018

In the pursuit of bringing better access to justice at lower cost for the people, Justice Hamid Sultan has developed a noble and prize winning concept to allow courts to propose arbitration to litigants that appear before them. The concept is new and it is hoped to pioneer the scheme in Malaysia.

This concept by Justice Hamid has been lucidly set out in his paper on University cum Court Annexed Arbitration - Proposal and Model Scheme Book (UCAA) enclosed.

The concept, proposes that parties who are already before the court for litigation may choose to instead have their dispute referred to UCCA. At the moment, disputes in court are only referred to mediation. The court will facilitate the UCCA just as it does for court annexed mediation with a slight difference, in that under the UCCA there is a decision unlike in mediation, where if it fails the case will revert back to court for adjudication.

The concept proposes to allow academicians and university faculty members / alumni from their respective disciplines to be arbitrators in cases within their field of expertise. This means an academician in the faculty of medicine can preside as an arbitrator in medical negligence cases and likewise an academician in the faculty of environmental management can facilitate in disputes arising from waste management. The concept also proposes an alternative for the parties to the litigation to choose a judicial officer of their choice as their arbitrator. The court’s premises will be used for conduct of the arbitration.

Unlike the conventional arbitration based on pre-dispute agreement of the parties, the UCCA concept is a post-dispute arbitration agreement. The concept proposes to cap cost at a minimum and allows parties to agree in advance that they each bear their own respective cost. As for the arbitrator’s fee, the concept proposes that the university arbitrators undertake the work for a minimum fee. While in the judicial officer arbitration, a nominal fee will have to be paid to the court.

The concept also proposes a time-line for completion of the arbitration and accompanying rules for a swift and quick disposal of the matter. The courts have over the time become too rigid with a thick set of procedural and technical rules. However, in arbitration, the rules are what parties choose. There can be a fair amount of flexibility to facilitate focusing on dispensation of justice according to merits as opposed to technicalities. The arbitration will be conducted by a mix of adversarial and inquisitorial system or as parties may choose.

It will relieve courts of case load as generally there is no appeal from an arbitration award. It will save a lot of public cost in administration of justice. It will also create a skill-competition among judicial officers as parties / their counsels recognising and choosing a particular judicial officer is an accreditation of the merits of the officer. For the university faculty members / alumni, it will develop them further with hands on knowledge and experiences, as well as it may be a catalyst for them to preside at international arbitrations in conventional arbitration centres in the future.

Added benefits to the parties will include that the award will enforceable in about 160 countries, by virtue of legislations made in line with New York Convention 1958. The scheme addresses and resolves the two major setbacks of arbitration, namely high cost and delays.

DATUK DR. HAJI HAMID SULTAN BIN ABU BACKER is a judge, Court of Appeal Malaysia;Adjunct Professor of International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) and Multimedia University (MMU);Panel Advisor of Islamic Science University of Malaysia (USIM);Barrister and a fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (London);Honorary Fellow, Middle East Institute (MEI), National University of Singapore;Honorary Visiting Professor of Damodaran Sanjivayya National Law University (DSNLU), Visakhapatnam, India.

A copy of the UCCA Model Scheme 2018 can be downloaded here.

By Francis Xavier

15 Feb 2024

Protecting members and the public interest

As Ciarb’s governance reform progresses, we meet the incoming and outgoing Chairs of the Professional Conduct Committee and share details of revisions to the Disciplinary Rules.

Read in Full

15 Feb 2024

Gilda Turitz FCIArb on why experience is critical to building a reputation

We speak to Gilda Turitz FCIArb about the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) sector in the USA, establishing her own practice, and working as both an arbitrator and mediator.

Read in Full

15 Feb 2024

PACCAR: Key issues for third party litigation funding agreements in England and Wales

The UK Supreme Court judgment in PACCAR raises important questions for third party litigation funding agreements. We explore the key issues, impact and consequences.

Read in Full